| [ Back
To Previous Page ] |
|
Source
|
| Am
J Surg

Volume: 182
Number: 649-653
2001 |
|
Can Specific Preoperative Counseling Increase the
Likelihood a Woman Will Choose Postmastectomy Breast
Reconstruction?
The authors of this paper should be commended for attempting
to shed light on the etiology of low rates of breast
reconstruction after mastectomy. Their results were
stratified by age and by whether mastectomy was elected
or required because of diagnosis and clinical presentation.
Their Conclusions suggest that low reconstructive rates
reflect patient desire rather than preoperative education
or access.
Two factors not addressed in this study were the content
of the preoperative counseling and the surgical options
available to the patients. In the United States, most
breast reconstruction involve the use of implants. Most
plastic surgeons recognize that autogenous reconstruction
provides a more natural permanent result than do other
methods. Unfortunately, the most commonly used autogenous
reconstruction techniques are limited by the donor site
morbidity inherent in the muscle sacrifice. Breast reconstruction
became more desirable when perforator and muscle-sparing
techniques were developed, but not all patients have
access to state-of-the-art techniques.
Plastic surgeons are duty-bound to make breast reconstruction
more desirable for patients to enhance the quality and
minimize the morbidity of breast reconstruction/ Multidisciplinary
breast cancer teams must ensure that patients receive
complete education concerning their surgical options,
and such teams must advocate access to the highest quality
of breast reconstruction rates, but in a different context
that the author's conclusions imply.
J.E. Craigie, MD
R.J. ALLEN, MD
|